<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tea.cesaroliveira.net/archives/33/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tea.cesaroliveira.net/archives/33</link>
	<description>It&#039;s all about the cycles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caco</title>
		<link>http://tea.cesaroliveira.net/archives/33/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Caco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cesaroliveira.net/?p=33#comment-54</guid>
		<description>&quot;That’s like Microsoft hiring Linus Torvalds to work on the Linux kernel&quot;

Well, I have to agree with you with most of the post. but I quoted this line, because Google and Mozilla are not actual enemies, even with the last announcements. I think that support an open-source project can be more productive (to you) than start you own open-source project. Making their all good ideas true, they&#039;ll be able to consume the good ideas which are already done by the open-source world, and thus improving their own product. But what I don&#039;t understand are the real intentions behind Chrome, which is open-source too. Two promising projects, both on the same line, both open-source. I would understand more if it were something like Picasa.

I&#039;ve heard that Chrome has been &quot;stealing&quot; more IE users than Firefox have done. And this could be an approach to users who aren&#039;t familiar with other browsers than Mifrosoft&#039;s.

The other thing I think (more interesting) is that Google wants complete control of Mozilla, and Chrome was a simply power demonstration. No big announcements, just releasing and it has been increasing in number of users. At least, they are proposing a tighter union between Google Labs and Mozilla Labs, to create the Googlezilla (or Moogle) web platform.

Just thinking.
Sorry for my bad English. Brasileiro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That’s like Microsoft hiring Linus Torvalds to work on the Linux kernel&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I have to agree with you with most of the post. but I quoted this line, because Google and Mozilla are not actual enemies, even with the last announcements. I think that support an open-source project can be more productive (to you) than start you own open-source project. Making their all good ideas true, they&#8217;ll be able to consume the good ideas which are already done by the open-source world, and thus improving their own product. But what I don&#8217;t understand are the real intentions behind Chrome, which is open-source too. Two promising projects, both on the same line, both open-source. I would understand more if it were something like Picasa.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that Chrome has been &#8220;stealing&#8221; more IE users than Firefox have done. And this could be an approach to users who aren&#8217;t familiar with other browsers than Mifrosoft&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The other thing I think (more interesting) is that Google wants complete control of Mozilla, and Chrome was a simply power demonstration. No big announcements, just releasing and it has been increasing in number of users. At least, they are proposing a tighter union between Google Labs and Mozilla Labs, to create the Googlezilla (or Moogle) web platform.</p>
<p>Just thinking.<br />
Sorry for my bad English. Brasileiro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

